2025 Green Hydrogen Round-up: the policies, auctions, and projects shaping what gets built next

Time to read:

10

mins

2025 was not just a big funding year for green hydrogen. It was a year where the market started separating announced hydrogen pipelines from executable hydrogen capacity. This round-up consolidates the most material developments across:
  • Green hydrogen policy and regulation updates across the leading markets
  • Hydrogen auctions and what they are implicitly optimizing for
  • Projects commissioned in 2025 that signal real execution momentum
  • Major electrolyser orders awarded in 2025 as a forward indicator of capacity buildout
  • IF25 Hydrogen Bank auction changes and what “winnable” means under the new rules

Disclaimer: IF25 commentary is based on draft terms and market guidance shared publicly. Final rules may differ.

Market context: why 2025 was a turning point for green hydrogen

The global electrolyser and green hydrogen market has entered a phase where scale is no longer theoretical. Multiple regions are now pushing projects beyond pilots into industrial-scale hydrogen and Power-to-X. But this phase also exposes constraints that were less visible at pilot scale: component bottlenecks, bankability concerns, local content rules, and the gap between an MoU and a bankable offtake.

1 | Major green hydrogen policy and regulation updates in 2025

Policy in 2025 could be best understood as a collection of market-shaping mechanisms like hydrogen bank auctions, national subsidies, reverse auctions for ammonia, and programmatic funding pools. Each market was structuring incentives slightly differently, but the direction is consistent - prioritizing projects that can move from development to commissioning on credible timelines.

European Commission

Europe remains a policy anchor through its Hydrogen Bank auction mechanism. Under IF24, the European Commission allocated USD 1 billion to 15 green hydrogen projects representing 2.3 GW of electrolyser capacity, and later invited additional reserve projects. In 2025, it also launched the IF25 Hydrogen Bank auction, committing about USD 1.5 billion to further scale production.

Netherlands

The Netherlands strengthened domestic deployment through major subsidy programs. It allocated about USD 1.4 billion to 12 green hydrogen projects totaling 702 MW of electrolyser capacity through the OWE Subsidy and SDE++ programs.

Spain

Spain allocated about USD 2.6 billion to 20+ green hydrogen projects through initiatives including Hydrogen Valleys, Auction-as-a-Service, NextGenerationEU, and RePowerEU. It also approved about USD 0.45 billion for IF25 Auctions-as-a-Service support.

India

India accelerated the market through auctions tied to fuels and industrial demand. SECI and state agencies awarded 724 kTPA of green ammonia capacity to 13 developers via reverse auctions. Separately, about USD 258 million was allocated to support around 450 kTPA of domestic green hydrogen production through auction routes.

Australia

Australia advanced large-scale hydrogen through Hydrogen Headstart. ARENA allocated about USD 0.8 billion to two hydrogen projects totaling about 1.5 GW under Round 1, and committed an additional USD 1.3 billion under Round 2 to accelerate scale.

2 | Which projects defined green hydrogen momentum in 2025?

Policy drives development, but commissioning signals execution. The projects below highlight where the ecosystem can deliver : large electrolyser deployments, integrated Power-to-X, and industrial use cases tied to fuels, chemicals, and hard-to-abate sectors.

Selected major green hydrogen and Power-to-X projects commissioned in 2025

China: world-scale execution and integrated Power-to-X

  • Chifeng Green Hydrogen and Ammonia Project (Phase 1), China: Developed by Envision Energy. A large-scale facility powered by off-grid renewables, positioned as a benchmark for integrated hydrogen and ammonia production.
  • Songyuan Hydrogen Energy Industrial Park, China: Led by LONGi Green Energy Technology. Integrated wind-solar hydrogen-biomass complex targeting large-scale green methanol production, strengthening low-carbon fuel ecosystems.
  • Da’an Wind-solar Green Hydrogen and Ammonia Project, China: Operated by Jilin Electric Power (SPIC). A large single-unit ammonia-linked project combining wind and solar power to reduce industrial emissions.

Europe: industrial decarbonisation and e-fuels as near-term anchors

  • Hy4Chem-EI, Germany: BASF deployed a 54 MW PEM electrolyser with Siemens Energy technology to supply CO2-free hydrogen for chemical production, with an emissions reduction potential cited at up to 72,000 tonnes per year.
  • Kassø e-Methanol Project, Denmark: Developed by European Energy with Mitsui. A large-scale e-methanol plant supporting decarbonisation of shipping and chemicals through low-carbon fuels.

China leads on multi-hundred-megawatt integrated projects, while Europe shows targeted execution in chemicals and e-fuels where demand is anchored.

3 | Which projects drove major electrolyser orders in 2025?

Electrolyser orders are a forward indicator of where hydrogen capacity will show up next. In 2025, notable awarded orders clustered around industrial fuels and chemicals in China, and port and backbone-linked hubs in Europe. These awards signal where confidence is highest in execution, grid access, infrastructure, and demand.

Selected notable green hydrogen projects where electrolyser orders were awarded in 2025

  • Xinjiang Korla Green Power Hydrogen Production Project, China: A renewable-powered hydrogen initiative supplying green hydrogen for industrial decarbonisation, supported by domestic manufacturing and state-backed development.
  • Altay Fuhai County PV-ESS Hydrogen, Ammonia and Methanol Integrated Project, China: An integrated PV-ESS hydrogen project combining production with ammonia and methanol synthesis, strengthening Xinjiang’s low-carbon industrial ecosystem.
  • Diaobingshan Wind Power-Hydrogen-Green Methanol Project, China: Wind-powered project converting renewable electricity into hydrogen and green methanol, supporting domestic use and export narratives.
  • ELYgator Project, Netherlands: Air Liquide’s Port of Rotterdam renewable hydrogen investment supplying industrial and mobility demand and aligning with Europe’s hydrogen backbone ambitions.

Orders concentrate where demand and infrastructure are clearer, and where projects have higher confidence in execution timelines and bankability.

4 | IF25 Hydrogen Bank Auction: the shift from price-only competition to execution certainty

The 3rd Hydrogen Bank Auction (IF25) introduces a more selective framework, and it is explicitly positioned as a step up from earlier rounds. With EUR 1.3 billion allocated, the updated conditions signal a move away from purely price-driven competition toward deliverability, compliance, and supply-chain robustness.

How IF23 and IF24 evolved into IF25 (what the framework is telling developers)

  • Funding amount: IF23 was about EUR 0.8 bn, IF24 expanded to about EUR 1.2 bn (with a general and maritime split), and IF25 is about EUR 1.3 bn.
  • Product subsidised: IF23 and IF24 focused on RFNBO hydrogen. IF25 explicitly expands scope to include RFNBO and electrolytic low-carbon hydrogen, changing who can compete and how projects position eligibility.

IF25 qualification factors: what changed, what is implied, and why it matters

Electrolyser origin and supply chain restrictions

IF25 strengthens sourcing criteria beyond the earlier approach. Restrictions now extend beyond stacks to other major components, increasing pressure on procurement strategy and early supplier selection.

  • What it filters out: projects that have not designed sourcing and procurement for compliance
  • What it rewards: bidders with robust, documented supplier strategies and lower exposure to restricted sourcing
  • Strategic implication: supply chain is now a bid strategy topic, not just a procurement topic

Offtake agreements: recency and credibility as a qualification gate

IF25 increases scrutiny on market demand proof. Offtake documentation must reflect current traction, and documents such as MoUs, LoIs, or term sheets must be recent.

  • What it filters out: outdated commitments that are not actively negotiated
  • What it rewards: projects with live commercial backing and credible counterparties
  • Strategic implication: developers must treat offtake as an ongoing, documented commercial process

Realisation and execution timelines

IF25 emphasizes delivery timelines by tightening what is tolerated between grant signing, financial close, and entry into operation. The market-level intent is to reduce “slow pipelines” and focus incentives on projects that can deliver on schedule.

  • What it filters out: projects that rely on long, uncertain development timelines
  • What it rewards: ready-to-execute projects that can show credible schedules and de-risked pathways
  • Strategic implication: schedule realism becomes a competitive advantage

Completion guarantees and bid seriousness

IF25 increases the cost of non-delivery by reinforcing completion guarantee expectations. This shifts the auction from “cheap bids” to “serious bids backed by capability and capital discipline”.

  • What it filters out: speculative bids and low-confidence development plans
  • What it rewards: bidders with stronger financing readiness and delivery assurance

The commercial implications for different stakeholders

Developers
  • Bid price is not enough: compliance, supply chain, and offtake maturity now decide eligibility
  • Procurement planning moves earlier: sourcing rules force earlier supplier decisions and contracts
  • Execution narrative matters: schedules, guarantees, and readiness become part of your bid strategy

Electrolyser OEMs and supply chain players
  • Origin rules create winners and losers: compliance readiness becomes a sales advantage
  • Component transparency matters: buyers need auditable sourcing pathways
  • Delivery credibility becomes commercial: lead times and after-sales support influence bankability

Investors and lenders
  • Frameworks reduce paper-risk: stricter gates can reduce exposure to non-executable pipelines
  • Policy alignment becomes due diligence: eligibility and compliance are now underwriting inputs
  • Offtake freshness is a signal: recent traction is a stronger indicator than older commitments

Offtakers
  • Offtake is becoming regulated proof: credible agreements strengthen project competitiveness
  • Negotiation timelines matter: recency rules reward active commercial engagement
  • Quality of counterparties increases: auctions will filter out weaker delivery prospects

This insight was powered by HyPrism.

Want more insights like this?

Access live data, project trackers, and market intelligence built for OEMs, EPCs, and investors.

Download the insight/report:
Click here to Download

Sources-

https://www.linkedin.com/posts/vnzinsights_top-green-hydrogen-projects-of-2025-activity-7416806067877068800-sC3c?utm_source=share&utm_medium=member_desktop&rcm=ACoAACOCu3YB0vggadlGysVLxKvF97KIfrjgVCY

Image Sources-

How Geography Impacts The Offtake Strategies Of The Winners Of The Latest European Hydrogen Bank Auction

Valuable decision making insights

Trusted experts providing strategic and personalized insights to help our clients unlock their full business and growth potential

NAVIGATE

CONTACT US

BUSINESS TERMS

All rights reserved 2023. Copyright VARKA Net Zero Advisory Private Limited

Designed by Studio VARKA

×